Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the fracture of zirconia abutments in implant treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library searches were performed and complemented by manual searches from database inception to February 11, 2018, for title and abstract analysis. RESULTS: Initially, 645 articles were obtained through database searches. Fifty-three articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies were analyzed regarding fracture rate, abutment-implant connection, time point of fracture, location of critical crack, causes, managements, and preventive measures with respect to zirconia abutment fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Lower fracture rates were reported for internal connection with metal component (2-piece) zirconia abutments compared with external and internal full-zirconia connection (one-piece) zirconia abutments. Overpreparation and overload should be avoided in case of zirconia abutments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gou et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: