Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to make a case study of a large academic library's web site redesign, undertaken during the 2003‐2004 academic year. Design/methodology/approach During the redesign process, numerous methods of eliciting user feedback were used; this included an online survey, focus groups with each of the Libraries' primary user populations, parallel design process to generate the first round of prototypes, low‐fidelity prototyping, card sorting, high‐fidelity prototyping, and three rounds of usability testing. The results of each type of feedback session were analyzed carefully in order to determine the most important areas for improvement and to provide valuable information regarding how users used the web site. Findings The design teams spent nine months developing a web site that was grounded in user‐centered design methodologies and employed appropriate usability standards. Feedback from users was sought at every step in the process and in very different ways. From each interaction with users, the design teams learned something valuable. By working through the design process with user needs at the fore, staff are confident that the resulting interfaces are functional, well‐planned, and most importantly, usable. Originality/value The paper provides a case study of UW Libraries' web site redesign process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennifer L. Ward (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: