Key result
Dual-chamber pacing prevented myocardial ischemia during induced tachycardia, whereas atrial pacing consistently induced myocardial lactate production in 3 patients with obstructive HCM.
Why the study?
Does dual-chamber tachypacing prevent myocardial ischemia compared to atrial tachypacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Case Report (n=3)
No
Does dual-chamber tachypacing prevent myocardial ischemia compared to atrial tachypacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Dual-chamber pacing exerts an acute anti-ischemic effect in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to atrial pacing, providing a potential mechanism for its clinical benefits on angina.
May reduce ischemia acutely in obstructive HCM; hypothesis-generating from small case series and requires prospective validation.
Dual-chamber pacing reportedly improves the quality of life by reducing the frequency of anginal episodes in selected patients with the obstructive form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), although the underlying mechanism or coronary effect is poorly understood. We report 3 patients with obstructive HCM, in whom the effects of atrial vs. dual-chamber tachypacing on systemic hemodynamics and myocardial lactate metabolism were studied. In all patients myocardial lactate production, objective evidence of myocardial ischemia, was demonstrated during atrial pacing, whereas no patient developed myocardial ischemia during dual-chamber pacing. By contrast, the responses of pressure gradient to pacing varied among the patients. These observations demonstrate for the first time that dual-chamber pacing exerted an anti-ischemic effect in obstructive HCM, which may contribute, at least partly, to the beneficial effects of chronic AV pacing on angina status and/or LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohri et al. (2003) conducted a case report in Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=3). Dual-chamber (AV sequential) pacing vs. Atrial pacing was evaluated on Myocardial lactate extraction ratio (evidence of myocardial ischemia). Dual-chamber pacing prevented myocardial ischemia during induced tachycardia, whereas atrial pacing consistently induced myocardial lactate production in 3 patients with obstructive HCM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: