We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceCaptured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“For decades, new percutaneous coronary therapies have required invasive angiography to assess late lumen loss. Considering the good diagnostic accuracy of [coronary CTA] in the absence of metal stents, and advantages in safety, [this technology] offers a noninvasive alternative to catheterization both for clinical care as well as research.”
“way too high”
“I don't think there's any remarkable theme with these [imaging] metrics.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nieman et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: