This review highlights various electron microscopy techniques for studying myocardial microvasculature and emphasizes the importance of nitrogen-bubbled glutaraldehyde to prevent artefactual reoxygenation damage during fixation.
Alerts to reoxygenation artefacts in ischaemic tissue fixation; leaves open standardized adoption in myocardial EM protocols.
This paper reviews various methods involving electron microscopy that have been used to investigate the ultrastructure of the vasculature of the normal and diseased heart. Whereas scanning electron microscopy is more commonly employed to record surface topography, it can be used to examine freeze-fracture planes within the myocardium and, using heavy-metal staining and back-scattered electron imaging, to examine large 2-mu-thick resin-embedded sections through the heart. The latter technique allows the comparison of structural alterations across the wall of the heart and thus accurate definition of the transmural progression of pathological processes. Transmission electron microscopy can then be used to provide more detailed information from precisely localised regions. Human myocardium can be usefully studied up to 12 hours post-mortem provided that suitable control material is included. Intravascular tracers including low-viscosity resin and nuclear track emulsion can be used to determine whether or not particular vessels allow flow at the time of fixation, and thus changes in the pattern of flow through the microvasculature due to ischaemia and reperfusion can be quantified and defined. Particular care is required in the fixation of ischaemic tissues because oxygen dissolved in the fixative can lead to the rapid formation of oxygen-free radicals on contact with the tissue. This produces artefactual reoxygenation damage characterised by membrane disruption and cell and organelle swelling, which has previously been attributed to ischaemic injury per se. Bubbling glutaraldehyde with nitrogen substantially reduces this artefact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavin et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: