Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As part of our study of novel antagonists at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA) subtype of excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptors and the pharmacophoric requirements of the receptor, we designed and synthesized a series of 1-substituted 6-imidazolyl-7-nitro-, and 7-imidazolyl-6-nitroquinoxalinediones, as well as related compounds, 6a-j, 7, 11a-e, 15, and 17, which are 1- and 4-substituted analogues of 1 (YM90K), and evaluated their activity to inhibit [3H]AMPA binding from rat whole brain. On the basis of their structure-activity relationships (SAR), we deduced that the amide proton of the imidazolyl-near side of the quinoxalinedione nucleus is not essential for AMPA receptor binding, whereas that of the imidazolyl-far amide is. Further, the receptors possess size-limited bulk tolerance for their N-substituents on the imidazolyl-near amide portion. Moreover, we found that introduction of a hydroxyl group at the imidazolyl-near amide portion causes a severalfold improvement in AMPA receptor affinity over unsubstituted derivatives. Among the compounds, 1-hydroxy-7-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)-6-nitro-2,3(1H,4H)-quinoxalinedione (11a) showed high affinity for AMPA receptor with a Ki value of 0.021 microM, which is severalfold greater than that of 1 and NBQX (2) (1,Ki = 0.084 microM; 2,Ki = 0.060 microM). Compound 11a also showed over 100-fold selectivity for the AMPA receptor than for the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and the glycine site on NMDA receptor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohmori et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: