Key result
Coronary slow flow phenomenon was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of early repolarization pattern compared to normal angiograms (65% vs. 28%, p=0.001).
Case-Control (n=160)
Absolute Event Rate: 65% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.001
The early repolarization pattern, a known risk factor for malignant ventricular arrhythmias, is significantly more prevalent in patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon compared to those with normal angiograms.
ERP may signal arrhythmia risk in CSFP; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical use.
BACKGROUND: The coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) is well-documented, and the early repolarization pattern (ERP) has recently been shown to be a risk factor for the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Those with true CSFP were included as cases and those with normal angiograms were included as controls. We assessed J-point elevation on surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) and defined ERP as notching or slurring of the terminal portion of the QRS takeoff. RESULTS: We enrolled 115 cases (33 females, 82 males; mean age, 51.9 ± 11.5 years) and 45 controls (13 females, 32 males; mean age, 50.8 ± 11.7 years). ERP was more common among cases than among controls (65% vs. 28%, p = .001). Compared with the controls, cases were more likely to have J-point elevation in the inferior leads (25% vs. 13%, p = .002), in the D1 to aVL leads (22% vs. 15%, p = .001), and in the lateral leads (17.3% vs. 0%), p = .001). Notching was also significantly more common in cases than in controls (26.0% vs. 2.2%, p = .0001). Finally, concave/ascendant ST segment (33.9% vs. 5.2%, p = .006), horizontal/non-ascendant ST segment (14.7% vs. 1.7%, p = .054), and horizontal/non-ascendant ST segment and notching (15.6% vs. 2.2%, p = .012) patterns were more common in cases than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: We report that CSFP is associated with J-wave and slurring ERPs. However, the clinical significance of these changes needs to be clarified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sucu et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in Coronary slow flow phenomenon (n=160). Coronary slow flow phenomenon vs. Normal angiograms was evaluated on Early repolarization pattern (ERP) (p=0.001). Coronary slow flow phenomenon was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of early repolarization pattern compared to normal angiograms (65% vs. 28%, p=0.001).