Five hundred forty-eight uncoagulated blood specimens from intravenous drug users infected with human T-lymphotropic virus type II (HTLV-II) were used to evaluate the sensitivities of the radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) and PCR for detecting HTLV-II-infected people. The sensitivities of both RIPA and PCR were found to be dependent on the HTLV-II antibody titer, as determined by the immunofluorescence assay. Neither of these recommended confirmatory methods was as sensitive for detecting weakly reactive HTLV-II specimens as the immunofluorescence assay, Western blotting (immunoblotting), or a modified licensed enzyme immunoassay. Use of RIPA and PCR to determine the reliabilities of other tests may sometimes give erroneous results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallo et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: