Key result
A classification and regression tree model using heart rate variability parameters achieved 93.58% accuracy, and 94% precision and recall, in classifying cardiac, diabetic, and normal subjects.
Why the study?
Cardiac and diabetic diseases are major sources of morbidity and mortality, but combined study of both conditions had not been explored.
Does a classification and regression tree (CART) model using HRV parameters accurately classify subjects as cardiac, diabetic, or normal?
Observational (n=78)
Does a classification and regression tree (CART) model using HRV parameters accurately classify subjects as cardiac, diabetic, or normal?
A decision tree model using HRV parameters can accurately classify patients with heart failure, diabetes, and healthy controls with high accuracy (93.58%).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HRV differences in combined cardiac-diabetic disease may aid risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Cardiac and diabetic diseases are common and troublesome complications, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates that cause a large economic burden. Researchers have explored cardiac or diabetic diseases for analysis separately; however, combined study of both diseases is missing. A retrospective Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analysis on ECG data was performed, analyzing the data of 78 subjects, which includes 26 cardiac (suffering from congestive heart failure), 17 diabetic and 35 normal (healthy subject or control) subjects. These subjects were labeled as cardiac, diabetic and normal based on HRV parameters. A classification and regression tree (CART) was employed to develop an automatic classifier to infer implications of disease in the early stages. Furthermore, to cross verify the above results, an orthostatic stress index was calculated from HRV parameters of ECG data recorded in the sitting and supine position. Cardiac subjects have the lowest HRV values among the three classes, whereas healthy subjects have the highest. The results are consistent with OSI values. The results are consistent with the consensus shown by previous studies, namely that depressed HRV is a useful tool for risk assessment in patients, and implying that cardiac subjects are at highest risk. The proposed classification model has achieved an accuracy of 93.58%, and a precision and recall of 94%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirole et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Congestive heart failure and diabetes (n=78). Classification and regression tree (CART) model using HRV parameters was evaluated on Classification accuracy. A classification and regression tree model using heart rate variability parameters achieved 93.58% accuracy, and 94% precision and recall, in classifying cardiac, diabetic, and normal subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: