This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Although transverse colon ptosis (TCP) is commonly diagnosed in patients with constipation, it has not attracted significant attention in the evaluation of constipation. Herein, we assessed the correlation between TCP-related radiological parameters and the severity of slow transit constipation (STC). Methods: This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study, with participants enrolled between 2012 and 2020 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China. STC was diagnosed according to Rome IV criteria and results of colonic transit test (CTT); healthy volunteers were also recruited as controls. All participants were examined using abdominal X-rays (AXRs) to acquire the radiological parameters related to TCP. Among these parameters, the degree of TCP (DTCP) was defined as the vertical distance from the top of the splenic flexure to the lowest point of the reverse colon. The Wexner Constipation Score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used to assess clinical severity. After multivariable linear regression, the correlations between radiological parameters and severity of STC were investigated. We also explored the differences in radiological parameters between the operation and the conservative group. Results: 93.00±32.57 mm; P<0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed that TCP-related parameters were consistent with the symptom severity of STC [e.g., parameter DTCP was strongly correlated with Wexner Constipation Score, with a β coefficient (95% CI) of 8.63 (8.24-9.02), P<0.001]. Multivariable linear regression models showed that patients with a larger DTCP were more likely to undergo surgery (23.67; 95% CI: 1.40-45.94; P=0.04). Conclusions: TCP-related parameters, especially the DTCP, may serve as novel and feasible alternative indices for the assessment of STC. However, the potential value of DTCP in assisting the evaluation of STC needs to be confirmed in study with a larger sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: