Key result
Between 2008 and 2015, the home haemodialysis population became more ethnically diverse and comorbid, with increased training time but stable mortality (11%) and technique failure (10%).
Why the study?
Changing population health and diversity in New Zealand may have shifted the landscape of home haemodialysis.
What are the demographic and clinical changes, and factors associated with successful home haemodialysis training and outcomes over time?
Cohort (n=152)
No
What are the demographic and clinical changes, and factors associated with successful home haemodialysis training and outcomes over time?
The home haemodialysis population in New Zealand has become more ethnically diverse and comorbid over time, requiring longer training but maintaining stable mortality and technique failure rates.
Stable outcomes despite rising comorbidities support broader eligibility; leaves open optimal training adaptations for diverse populations.
BACKGROUND: The health and diversity of the population in New Zealand (NZ) is changing under the influence of many socio-economic factors. This may have shifted the landscape of home haemodialysis (HHD). AIMS: To examine the demographic and clinical changes, determinants of HHD training and technique outcome and mortality between 2008 and 2015 at Auckland District Health Board, NZ. METHODS: We compared three incident cohorts of HHD patients between 2008 and 2015. Relevant factors, including demographic and clinical characteristics, training failure, technique failure and mortality were recorded. Factors associated with training and technique failure were examined by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 152 patients, 133 completed training, 13 (10%) experienced technique failure and 15 (11%) died. Significant changes in ethnicity (increased: Māori 1.7-fold, Asian 1.7-fold and Pasifika 1.4-fold; decreased: NZ European 2.7-fold, P = 0.001), and major comorbidities, ≥2 major comorbidities (1.8-fold increase, P = 0.03), diabetes (2.1-fold increase, P = 0.013) and heart failure (P = 0.04) were seen. HHD as first renal replacement therapy modality increased 15-fold (P = 0.0001) and training time increased by 4.5 weeks (P = 0.004). Death and technique failure were unchanged over time. Shorter training time, employment and lower C-reactive protein were associated with 'Successful HHD'. 'Unsuccessful HHD' patient characteristics differed by ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The HHD population has become more representative of the NZ population, but significantly more comorbid over time. Patient training time has increased, but mortality and technique failure remain stable. 'Successful HHD' is predicted by social and clinical factors, and 'unsuccessful HHD' may have different mechanisms in different patient groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beig et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in End-stage renal disease requiring home haemodialysis (n=152). Time period (2008-2015) vs. Earlier incident cohorts was evaluated on Training failure, technique failure, and mortality. Between 2008 and 2015, the home haemodialysis population became more ethnically diverse and comorbid, with increased training time but stable mortality (11%) and technique failure (10%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: