The crystal structure of alpha-K(3)AlF(6) was solved and refined from a combination of powder X-ray and neutron diffraction data (a = 18.8385(3)A, c = 33.9644(6)A, S.G. I4(1)/a, Z = 80, R(P)(X-ray) = 0.037, R(P)(neutron) = 0.053). The crystal structure is of the A(2)BB'X(6) elpasolite type with the a = b approximately a(e) square root(5), c = 4a(e) superstructure (a(e), parameter of the elpasolite subcell) and rock-salt-type ordering of the K and Al cations over the B and B' positions, respectively. The remarkable feature of alpha-K(3)AlF(6) is a rotation of 2/5 of the AlF(6) octahedra by approximately pi/4 around one of the crystal axes of the elpasolite subcell, coinciding with the 4-fold symmetry axes of the AlF(6) octahedra. The rotation of the AlF(6) octahedra replaces the corner-sharing between the K and Al polyhedra by edge-sharing, resulting in an increase of coordination numbers of the K cations at the B positions up to 7 and 8. Due to significant deformations of the K polyhedra, the corner-sharing connectivity of the octahedral elpasolite framework is broken and the rotations of the AlF(6) octahedra do not have a cooperative character. Elpasolites and double perovskites with similar structural organization are discussed. The difference in ionic radii of the B and B' cations as well as the tolerance factor are proposed to be the parameters governing the formation of elpasolites and double perovskites with broken corner-sharing connectivity of the octahedral framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abakumov et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: