Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cyclic behavior of a steel brace elastically restrained at both ends was studied experimentally. The specimens were manufactured by shaping SS 41 mild steel sheet. Ratio of member length l to radius gyration of the cross section i, stiffness of rotational restraining spring at both ends, eccentricity of a load and shape of the cross section were varied in this test. The results may be summarized as follows, 1) Value of l/i and existence of restraining springs influence on the cyclic axial load-displacement curves remarkably. 2) Under the identical value of l/i, the plastic energy absorption capacity of a restrained brace is considerably larger than one of a pin supported brace. 3) Also under the identical value of l_k/i, the ratio of the effective buckling length l_k depending on the end restraints to i, the plastic energy absorption capacity of a restrained brace is larger than one of a pin supported brace. 4) As the stiffness of restraining spring increases the value of magnification factors α that explain the effects of end restraints on the cyclic behavior of braces under the identical value of l_k/i decreased. 5) Eccentricity of a load does not hardly influence on the cyclic behavior of a brace, expect for the difference in the maximum compression load attained in the initiate loading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakabayashi et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: