The serum level of IL-6 was reported to reflect disease severity in patients with multiple myeloma. We used a specific radioimmunoassay to measure the level of IL-6 in 239 serum samples in which a monoclonal gammopathy was identified for the first time. The same sample was used for the measurement of serum C reactive protein and serum albumin. Then, an inventory of clinical and biological features allowed us to classify these patients into five groups: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS:128), multiple myeloma (MM:66), Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM:27), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL:11) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL:7). The number of patients with serum IL-6 (S-IL-6) level > 0.335 ng/ml (upper limit in normal sera) was significantly higher in the MM group (35%; Confidence Interval (CI) 23.5-46.5) compared with the MGUS group (15%; CI 8.8-21.2). The distribution of S-IL-6 levels was also significantly different between the groups (Mann-Whitney test: P < 0.01). High S-IL-6 levels were measured in 5/11 patients with NHL and 9/27 patients with WM. The distribution of S-IL-6 levels in these groups was the same as that in MGUS or MM groups. In patients with MM, elevated S-IL-6 levels were associated with haemoglobin level < 100 g/l (P < 0.005), bone marrow plasmocytosis > 50% (P < 0.005) and stages II and III in the Durie & Salmon staging system (P < 0.005). The S-IL-6 level was also related to light chain component excretion in urine (P < 0.01) and M component serum level for IgA (P < 0.01). In patients with MGUS, the S-IL-6 level correlated with serum CRP level (P < 0.05), serum lactate dehydrogenase (P < 0.05) and serum ferritin (P < 0.01). We conclude that the S-IL-6 level is a marker of high tumour burden in multiple myeloma. However, S-IL-6 level can be increased in patients with MGUS in relation to inflammatory parameters. Therefore the S-IL-6 level does not demonstrate high predictive value for the diagnosis of MM in patients with newly identified monoclonal gammopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duvillard et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: