Evaluation of formaldehyde and fifteen biocides in formaldehyde sensitive (S) and resistant (R) strains ofPseudomonas aeruginosa revealed a pattern of response that allowed a comparison of the mode of action of these biocides. The response of these strains to the various biocides, as well as the induction of transient resistance or cross-resistance in the (S) strain, allowed a grouping of biocides based on this pattern of response. Group 1 biocides acted in a manner indistinguishable from formaldehyde for both the (S) and (R) strains. Group 2 biocides were not effective against either the (S) or (R) strains at concentrations calculated to release equimolar concentrations of formaldehyde. However, treatment of the (S) strain with formaldehyde or Group 2 biocides resulted in the development of cross-resistance. Group 3 biocides were equally effective against the (S) and (R) strain, but the (S) strain survivors of treatment with Group 3 biocides were resistant to formaldehyde. Group 4 biocides (controls) had no presumed connection to formaldehyde mode of action. These four groupings, based on pattern of response, also resulted in groupings of biocides based on chemical structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sondossi et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: