Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, we examined the in vitro effect of an anti-CD44 mAb, S5, on NK function using canine PBMC as effectors. S5 enhanced NK activity in a dose-dependent and rapid fashion as did IM7, another anti-CD44 mAb that recognizes a common epitope(s) on CD44. Other anti-CD44 mAb (Hermes-1 and S3) that recognize epitopes distinct from S5 and IM7 had a variable effect on NK activity. The activation of increased killing by S5 only occurred when NK-sensitive targets were used, suggesting that lymphokine-activated killer cells were not being induced. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity was not the mechanism involved in the augmentation of NK activity, nor was it Fc receptor-dependent, inasmuch as S5 F(ab')2 was able to increase NK activity. F(ab') fragments of S5 were equivalent to intact S5 in their ability to stimulate NK activity, demonstrating that cross-linking of CD44 was not a necessary component of stimulation, and that nonspecific agglutination of target and effector cells was not occurring via the two F(ab) arms. The enhancement of NK function was monocyte-independent and mediated by radioresistant cells, indicating that the antibody enhanced NK cells directly. This finding would suggest that CD44 can direct a transmembrane signal for NK cell activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: