Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that the founding logics of late neoliberalism actively mitigate against a radically democratic future. By calling attention to the invocatory drive which is responsible for effecting the Symbolic order’s interpellative address, the article makes the case that Lacan’s retheorization of desire, the drives, and/as jouissance opens the way toward an ontologically grounded conception of radical political agency and rhetorical intervention whose abiding ethical injunction is to “imagine there’s no Publics!”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biesecker et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: