Key result
SEN virus co-infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C was associated with more severe parenchymal inflammatory cell infiltration and irregular regeneration, but did not affect HCC incidence.
Why the study?
Does SEN virus co-infection influence histological findings or clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and liver cirrhosis?
Observational (n=473)
Does SEN virus co-infection influence histological findings or clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and liver cirrhosis?
SEN virus co-infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C is associated with more severe liver histological changes but does not affect the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma or overall survival.
Does not support altering HCC surveillance for SEN virus co-infection; leaves open its role in histological progression in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This investigation compared the histological findings in the livers of chronic hepatitis C patients who were or were not co-infected with SEN virus (SEN-V) to determine the histological and clinical characteristics of SEN-V infection in Japan. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-two patients with hepatitis C virus-associated chronic hepatitis (CH) or liver cirrhosis (LC) were included in the study. Serum samples were tested for the presence of SEN-V DNA by nested polymerase chain reaction. The liver biopsy specimen of each patient was examined and scores were assigned to indicate the severity of each of the following features: inflammatory cell infiltration in the periportal, parenchymal, and portal areas; F stage; portal sclerotic change; perivenular fibrosis; pericellular fibrosis; damage to the bile ducts; steatosis and irregular regeneration of hepatocytes (IR). RESULTS: Of the 473 patients, 194 (41.0%) were positive for SEN-V DNA. The rate of progression of F stage correlated with SEN-V DNA positivity. The blood biochemical parameters did not differ significantly between the SEN-V DNA-positive and -negative patients. The histological features of the livers of SEN-V DNA-positive patients included more severe parenchymal inflammatory cell infiltration and more IR. In particular, among those at the F2, F3 and F4 stages, the degree of IR of the SEN-V DNA-positive patients was significantly greater than that of the SEN-V DNA-negative patients. The cumulative probability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence and survival rate did not differ between the SEN-V DNA-positive and-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: SEN-V co-infection may influence the histopathological features of the livers of patients with type C CH and LC but does not affect the outcome of patients with type C chronic liver disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moriyama et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Chronic hepatitis C and liver cirrhosis (n=473). SEN virus (SEN-V) co-infection vs. No SEN-V co-infection was evaluated on Histological findings in the liver and incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. SEN virus co-infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C was associated with more severe parenchymal inflammatory cell infiltration and irregular regeneration, but did not affect HCC incidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: