Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have demonstrated a pathological role for interleukin-1 (IL-1) in experimental models of glomerulonephritis, but the cellular pattern of renal IL-1 production remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study, therefore, was to identify the cell types expressing IL-1 in normal and diseased rat kidney. METHODS: Renal IL-1 beta expression was examined in normal rats and during a 21-day time course of rat accelerated anti-GBM glomerulonephritis by northern blotting, in situ hybridization and double immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Interleukin-1 beta mRNA expression was readily detectable in normal rat kidney by northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization. Immunohistochemistry staining demonstrated constitutive IL-1 beta expression by glomerular endothelial cells and cortical tubular epithelial cells. There was a marked increase in whole kidney IL-1 beta mRNA in rat anti-GBM glomerulonephritis. Glomerular IL-1 beta immunostaining was upregulated, being expressed by podocytes, mesangial cells and infiltrating macrophages, and was particularly prominent within glomerular crescents. Double staining with the ED1 antibody showed IL-1 beta expression in up to 13% of glomerular macrophages, whereas 48% of macrophages within crescents stained for IL-1 beta. However, the most marked increase in IL-1 beta expression was seen in cortical tubular epithelial cells, particularly in areas of tubular damage. In situ hybridization confirmed that tubular IL-1 beta staining was due to local cytokine synthesis rather than protein absorption. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified constitutive IL-1 beta expression by glomerular endothelium and tubular epithelial cells in normal rat kidney. In addition, the marked upregulation of IL-1 beta expression by intrinsic glomerular cells and tubules in rat anti-GBM disease suggests an important role for these cells in IL-1 dependent crescent formation and tubulointerstitial injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tesch et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: