The potential for generating energy during swimming via anaerobic metabolism and the ability to recover from exhaustive activity were examined in an actively foraging (creek chub, Semotilus atromaculatus) and a characteristically sit-and-wait species of fish (mudminnow, Umbra limi). The anaerobic threshold, as measured by a rise in muscle lactate, occurred at a higher swimming speed for the creek chub (~ 5 body lengths s⁻¹) than for the mudminnow (~2.0 body lengths s⁻¹). Anaerobic scope, defined as the rate of muscle-lactate production during maximal sprint activity, was 87% higher for the mudminnow (5.84 μmol g⁻¹ min⁻¹) than for the creek chub (3.13 μmol g⁻¹ min⁻¹). Whole-body anaerobic capacity at exhaustion (4 min) was also greater for mudminnows (9.82 μmol g⁻¹) than for creek chubs (6.46 μmol g⁻¹). The rate constant for muscle-lactate disappearance following exhaustion, however, was slightly higher for creek chubs (-0.63) than for mudminnows (-0.40). The time required for muscle-lactate concentration to return to resting values in these 1-2-g fish (4-6 h) was much less than previously reported times for large fish. Muscle-glucose concentration during recovery from 8 min of exhaustive activity was relatively unchanged in the creek chub but increased threefold in the mudminnow. The rate of increase in muscle-glycogen concentration following exhaustive activity was approximately sixfold higher for the mudminnow (23.6 mg [100 g]⁻¹ h⁻¹) than for the creek chub (3.7 mg [100 g]⁻¹ h⁻¹). Estimates of the time required for complete glycogen restoration were 6 h and 14 h for the mudminnow and creek chub, respectively. These results suggest that increased potential for and reliance on anaerobic energy production during swimming is characteristic of sit-and-wait foraging behavior in fish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edward M. Goolish (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: