The purpose of this paper is to develop an analytic foundation for the determination of whether a mathematical model and its desired computations are "well-posed" in order to help alleviate the software problems associated with the simulation of complex large-scale systems by heterogeneous mathematical models involving several hundred dimensions. The problem is approached by providing a rigorous basis for the commonplace notion of constraint. Four distinct viewpoints of the mathematical model are established: 1) the set theoretic relation space; 2) the family of submodels; 3) the bipartite graph, which provides topological insight; and 4) the constraint matrix. Fundamental definitions of mathematical model consistency, computational allowability, and extrinsic and intrinsic constraint are established on a set theory basis. Correspondences are proved between the topological properties of a model's graph and its constraint properties. Variables located in different connected components of a graph are always mutually consistent, but computations performed on them are never allowable. If a model graph of universal relations has a tree structure, then all its variables are mutually consistent. Detailed treatment of special relation classes will be given in Parts II and III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friedman et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: