Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula with conventional oxygen therapy for preventing postoperative hypoxemia in patients with lung resection surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Background: The efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients extubated after lung resection surgery remains inconclusive. Our objective was to execute a meticulous systematic meta-analysis to accurately assess the advantages of HFNC compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) for patients extubated after lung resection surgery, by examining postoperative hypoxemia and other patient-focused outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. We employed the revised Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool (2.0) to evaluate the RoB of the included studies, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to ascertain the certainty of the pooled effect estimates. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia. Results: ) within first 24 hours after extubation, hospital length of stay [mean difference (MD), -0.19; 95% CI: -0.44 to 0.06; moderate certainty], and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (MD, 0.02; 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.19; high certainty). Conclusions: difference, hospital and ICU length of stay. However, HFNC may significantly enhance the oxygenation index within the first 12 hours post-extubation following lung resection surgery. To verify the effect of HFNC on this population, additional large-scale, multicenter studies are essential.