This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Unsymmetrical N-aryl-N′-alkylpyridyl β-diketiminate ligands (HL1 and HL2) enable fine control over the coordination geometry, spin-state, and reactivity of nickel(II) and nickel(I) complexes through variation in pyridyl chelating arm length. Treatment of NiCl2(2,4-lutidine)2 with deprotonated ligands HL1 and HL2 in THF afforded the corresponding complexes L1NiIICl and L2NiIICl, respectively. X-ray crystallography reveals that L1NiIICl adopts a distorted square-planar geometry and is diamagnetic, whereas L2NiIICl exhibits the rare paramagnetic seesaw geometry due to the extended six-membered chelate ring. Reduction with KC8 yields the three-coordinate nickel(I) complexes L1NiI (T-shaped) and L2NiI (Y-shaped), with rhombic EPR signals (g1 = 2.288–2.349) reflecting ligand-modulated spin density. Most notably, L2NiIICl undergoes unprecedented slow activation of the β-diketiminate backbone in acetonitrile, producing the high-spin five-coordinate adduct [L2MeCNHNiCl][Cl], providing evidence for nitrile-induced ligand modification, a reactivity absent in the shorter-arm analogue L1NiIICl. In contrast, hydroxide coordination affords the mononuclear square-planar L1NiIIOH with a terminal OH group, whereas L2NiIICl forms the diamagnetic dimer L2Ni(μ–OH)2NiL2 with bridging hydroxides, demonstrating ligand-dependent nuclearity control. These results highlight how chelate ring size and ligand flexibility serve as powerful levers for tuning electronic structure, coordination geometry, spin multiplicity, and ligand-centered reactivity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: