Key result
Enhanced sternal closure with the SternaLock 360 system resulted in no cases of surgical revision, sternal instability, deep wound infections, or sternal pain at follow-up.
Why the study?
Prevention of sternal complications in increasingly complex cardiac surgery patients remains challenging, requiring evaluation of new individualized closure techniques like combined band and plate fixation.
Does enhanced sternal closure with combined band and plate fixation provide safe and effective outcomes in patients at risk of sternal complications after cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=17)
No
Does enhanced sternal closure with combined band and plate fixation provide safe and effective outcomes in patients at risk of sternal complications after cardiac surgery?
Enhanced sternal closure with the SternaLock 360 system appears safe and feasible for patients at risk of sternal complications after cardiac surgery.
Small single-center series supports SL360 feasibility in high-risk sternal closure; leaves open efficacy versus standard wiring in randomized trials.
Due to the advent of interventional therapies for low- and intermediate-risk patients, case complexity has increased in cardiac surgery over the last decades. Despite the surgical progress achieved to keep up with the increase in the number of high-risk patients, the prevention of sternal complications remains a challenge requiring new, individualized sternal closure techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility, as well as the in-hospital and long-term outcomes, of enhanced sternal closure with combined band and plate fixation using the new SternaLock® 360 (SL360) system as an alternative to sternal wiring. From 2020 to 2022, 17 patients underwent enhanced sternal closure using the SL360 at our institution. We analyzed perioperative data, as well as clinical and radiologic follow-up data. The results were as follows: In total, 82% of the patients were treated with the SL360 based on perioperative risk factors, while in 18% of cases, the SL360 was used for secondary closure due to sternal instability. No perioperative complications were observed. We obtained the follow-up data of 82% of the patients (median follow-up time: 141 (47.8 to 511.5) days), showing no surgical revision, no sternal instability, no deep wound infections, and no sternal pain at the follow-up. In one case, a superficial wound infection was treated with antibiotics. In conclusion, enhanced sternal closure with the SL360 is easy to perform, effective, and safe. This system might be considered for both primary and secondary sternal closure in patients at risk of sternal complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miazza et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Risk of sternal complications after cardiac surgery (n=17). SternaLock 360 (SL360) combined band and plate fixation was evaluated on Sternal complications (surgical revision, sternal instability, deep wound infections, sternal pain). Enhanced sternal closure with the SternaLock 360 system resulted in no cases of surgical revision, sternal instability, deep wound infections, or sternal pain at follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: