The title compound was synthesized in 88% yield by reducing the uranium(IV) dication [U(COT)(HMPA)3][BPh4]2 (COT = η-C8H8) with sodium amalgam while the neodymium analogue was prepared by substitution of the THF ligands in [Nd(COT)(THF)4][BPh4]. Comparison of the crystal structures of the complexes [M(COT)(HMPA)3][BPh4] (M = U, Nd, Sm) shows that the variations in the M−ligand bond lengths simply reflect the differences in the ionic radii of the metals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guillaume et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: