Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heavy-haul railways face significant energy losses due to motion resistance, particularly from wheel-rail interactions and suspension dynamics. This study investigates the influence of suspension parameters on energy dissipation through a combined sensitivity analysis employing multibody simulation. A meter-gauge freight wagon was modeled in SIMPACK® using a Box-Behnken experimental design to evaluate five key parameters: primary suspension stiffness (longitudinal/lateral), secondary suspension stiffness, wedge height, and wedge friction. Simulations covered multiple curve radii (300–2000 m) and speeds (35–65 km/h), compared against a 40 km of a heavy-haul line. Results demonstrated that primary suspension longitudinal stiffness and wedge height dominated energy dissipation. In tight curves (≤500 m), the influence of suspension stiffness became more pronounced due to increased flange contact, whereas in smoother curves, wedge interactions dominated the dynamic behavior The wedge height-friction interaction surpassed individual parameter effects, highlighting the need for integrated maintenance. The 300 m curve simplification exhibited a high correlation (>0.93) with full-track energy dissipation across all speed ranges, allowing for accurate energy estimation via reduced-section simulations, with a mean error under 5%. These findings provide a methodology for optimizing suspension systems and simplifying energy assessments in heavy-haul operations. The validated 300 m curve equivalency enhances computational efficiency for network-scale analyses without compromising accuracy. Additionally, the parameter sensitivity findings support targeted maintenance strategies aimed at improving energy efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pacheco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: