Key result
The Hindi version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-H) demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.70) and test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.70), establishing it as a valid tool for assessing health-related quality of life in CAD patients.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to translate and validate the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire into Hindi (CROQ-H) to measure patient-reported outcomes before and after coronary revascularisation procedures.
Observational (n=391)
No
The Hindi version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-H) is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument for measuring patient-reported outcomes in Indian patients undergoing PTCA or CABG.
CROQ-H supports outcome assessment in Hindi-speaking revascularisation patients; leaves open larger prospective validation before routine use.
Objectives: The Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) is a patient reported outcome measure. It is used to measure health related outcomes from the patient’s perspective before and after coronary revascularisation procedures (PTCA and CABG). This study involved the translation and validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire into Hindi language (CROQ-H). Methodology: The English version of the CROQ was translated into Hindi version; some terms were revised to, adjust for the sociocultural status of the Indian environment. Ten patients completed the questionnaire in a pilot to check for comprehension and, face validity. In the field study, subjects were recruited from Geetanjali Cardiac Centre (GCC), Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Geetanjali University, Udaipur, India. Questionnaires were self-administered. Analysis included acceptability, reliability (internal consistency and test–retest), validity (factor analysis, known-groups and responsiveness testing. Results: A total of 470 patients gave informed consent to participate and 391(83%) of these participated in field study. All versions were met pre-specified criteria; (1) acceptability of items (low missing data)); (2) reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.70, item total correlations >0.30) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.70); (3) construct validity based on within-scale analyses (internal consistency (Cronbach’s α >0.70).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dwivedi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=391). Hindi version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-H) was evaluated on Validity and reliability of CROQ-H (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness). The Hindi version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ-H) demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.70) and test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.70), establishing it as a valid tool for assessing health-related quality of life in CAD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: