Key result
Unfavorable CYP2C19 genotypes show no significant link to increased clopidogrel resistance.
Why the study?
Clopidogrel response shows wide individual variability linked to CYP2C19 polymorphisms, and clopidogrel resistance relates to adverse outcomes in CAD, but prevalence and effects in Mexican mestizo patients needed evaluation.
Do CYP2C19 polymorphisms affect residual platelet activity in Mexican mestizo patients on clopidogrel treatment?
Cross-Sectional (n=171)
No
Do CYP2C19 polymorphisms affect residual platelet activity in Mexican mestizo patients on clopidogrel treatment?
CYP2C19 polymorphisms alone do not fully explain clopidogrel resistance in Mexican mestizo patients, highlighting the multifactorial nature of residual platelet reactivity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-significant trend warrants no genotyping change in practice; leaves open CYP2C19 role in Mexican mestizo clopidogrel response.
Background/Objectives: There is wide variability in the individual response to clopidogrel, which depends on CYP2C19 polymorphisms as well as on intrinsic and extrinsic platelet factors. Clopidogrel resistance has been related to an adverse evolution in patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms in Mexican mestizo patients and their relationship with clopidogrel platelet response by means of platelet aggregation. Methods: Patients who experienced coronary artery disease (CAD) (N = 160) or stroke (N = 11) and received treatment with clopidogrel were analyzed for CYP2C19 alleles *1, *2, *3, and *17. In total, 81 patients were tested for clopidogrel resistance by ADP-induced aggregation in platelet-rich plasma. CYP2C19 polymorphism was expressed as ultrarapid-, normal-, rapid-, normal/intermediate, intermediate, and poor metabolizers, and the clopidogrel response was assessed by platelet aggregation. Results: The allelic frequencies were 9.6%, 0%, and 11.7% for CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17, respectively. The frequencies of CYP2C19 genotypes were as follows: CYP2C19*1/*1 (62.6%); CYP2C19*1/*17 (19.9%); CYP2C19*1/*2 (12.3%); CYP2C19*2/*17 (2.3%); CYP2C19*2/*2 (2.3%); and CYP2C19*17/*17 (0.6%). Of 81 patients with platelet aggregation, 55.6% were responsive, and 44.4% were resistant to clopidogrel. Clopidogrel resistance had a non-significant trend of association with unfavorable genotypes for metabolism (CYP2C19 *1/*2, *2/*17, and *2/*2) vs. favorable genotypes (CYP2C19 *1/*1, *1/*17, and *17/*17), 64.7% vs. 39.1%, respectively (p = 0.059). Conclusions: The prevalence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms in Mexican mestizo patients is similar to that of the general population. Clopidogrel resistance is a complex in vitro phenomenon that is not explained by CYP2C19 polymorphisms alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izaguirre-Ávila et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary or cerebral atherosclerosis (n=171). Unfavorable CYP2C19 genotypes (*1/*2, *2/*17, *2/*2) vs. Favorable CYP2C19 genotypes (*1/*1, *1/*17, *17/*17) was evaluated on Clopidogrel resistance (maximal platelet aggregation ≥ 60%) (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.94-8.71, p=0.059). Unfavorable CYP2C19 genotypes showed a non-significant trend toward higher clopidogrel resistance compared to favorable genotypes (64.7% vs 39.1%, OR 2.86, p=0.059).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: