Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A potentiometric sensor‐based flow‐injection system for determining iodide is described. The system utilizes a flow‐through sandwich cell and incorporates iron (II)‐tris bathophenanthroline iodide ion pair complex as an exchange site in a PVC matrix membrane. The sensor displays a fast response for 10−1 to 10−6 M iodide ion with an anionic slope of 59.1 ± 0.3 mV/concentration decade over the pH range 1 to 11. The experimental setup offers a precise, sensitive, selective and high sample throughput technique for determining iodide and iodine over a wide range of concentration. The limit of detection is 0.5 ppm iodide in a 20 μL sample. The average recovery is 99.8%, and the mean standard deviation is 0.5%. Sequential flow‐injection determination of iodide and iodine in some pharmaceutical preparations containing povidone iodine is performed by sample injection in a sodium sulfate‐ascorbic acid stream and monitoring of the total iodide equivalent to I− and I2. This is followed by injection of a second sample in an alkaline resorcinol stream and measuring of the iodide equivalent to I− and 1/2 I2. Iodine and iodide concentrations are calculated from the consecutive signals. The method gives results in good agreement with those obtained by the United States Pharmacopeia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: