Key result
In patients surviving acute coronary syndrome, severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) was associated with a significantly higher risk of the composite cardiovascular endpoint compared to normal renal function (adjusted HR 2.14).
Why the study?
Information is lacking on long-term management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and chronic kidney disease.
Does chronic kidney disease affect antithrombotic management patterns and increase the risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=22,380)
Yes
Does chronic kidney disease affect antithrombotic management patterns and increase the risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Hazard Ratio: 2.14 (95% CI 1.68–2.73)
Absolute Event Rate: 26.3% vs 4.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In survivors of acute coronary syndrome, chronic kidney disease is associated with less aggressive antithrombotic management and an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular and bleeding events.
CKD links to less DAPT post-ACS and higher events; leaves open optimal regimens pending prospective trials.
Information is lacking on long-term management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Our objectives were to describe antithrombotic management patterns and outcomes in patients with ACS with varying renal function from the EPICOR (long-tErm follow-uP of antithrombotic management patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients; NCT01171404) and EPICOR Asia (NCT01361386) studies. EPICOR and EPICOR Asia were prospective observational studies of patients who survived hospitalization for ACS and were enrolled at discharge in 28 countries across Europe, Latin America, and Asia. The studies were conducted from 2010 to 2013 and from 2011 to 2014, respectively. This analysis evaluated patient characteristics and oral antithrombotic management patterns and outcomes up to 2 years post-discharge according to admission eGFR: ≥ 90, 60–89, 30–59, or < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Among 22,380 patients with available data, eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was observed in 16.7%. Patients with poorer renal function were older, were at greater cardiovascular risk, and had more prior cardiovascular disease and bleeding. Patients with CKD underwent fewer cardiovascular interventions and had more in-hospital cardiovascular and bleeding events. Dual antiplatelet therapy was less likely at discharge in patients with eGFR < 30 (82.3%) than in those with ≥ 90 (91.3%) mL/min/1.73 m 2 and declined more sharply during follow-up in patients with low eGFR ( p < 0.0001). An adjusted proportional hazards model showed that patients with lower eGFR levels had a higher risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding. The presence of CKD in patients with ACS was associated with less aggressive cardiovascular management and an increased risk of cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Renal Impairment (n=22,380). Severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) vs. Normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) was evaluated on Composite cardiovascular endpoint (death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal ischemic stroke) (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.68-2.73, p=<0.0001). In patients surviving acute coronary syndrome, severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) was associated with a significantly higher risk of the composite cardiovascular endpoint compared to normal renal function (adjusted HR 2.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: