Why the study?
Does the wave rectification method accurately detect atrial fibrillation and flutter in ECG signals?
Does the wave rectification method accurately detect atrial fibrillation and flutter in ECG signals?
A proposed wave rectification method for ECG analysis demonstrated 91.8% accuracy in detecting atrial fibrillation and flutter.
Supports automated AF detection development; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Rapid detection of atrial flutter or fibrillation is needed in intensive care or home ECG monitoring with alarm generation, and in portable monitors with warningfunction, etc. Detection and assessment of these atrial abnormalities is necessary in computerized morphological analysis as well, to decide whether parameter measurements should be rejected, restricted to QRS and/or T wave only, or limited to those leads where atrial flutter orfibrillation waves are less expressed. A method for the detection and measurement of atrial flutter and fibrillation in the T-P segments of the ECG is proposed. An atrial flutter/ fibrillation parameter (AFF) is defined as the mean value of the differentiated filtered and rectified signal in these segments. The AFF has been measured in 329 patients from an annotated atrial flutter-fibrillation database. A threshold of AFF=0.35% with respect to the maximum signal excursion was chosen by a heuristic algorithm, to separate patients with atrial arrhythmia. The accuracy of the method was 91.8 %. The positive and negative detection errors of the AFF classification are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2001 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: