This review examines the concepts of plaque stabilisation and passivation via systemic and local drug delivery to prevent acute coronary syndromes.
Highlights potential for drug-based plaque stabilization in ACS prevention; leaves open efficacy confirmation in randomized trials.
Clinical manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis are mainly a consequence of one of the following pathogenesis: The lack of a linear relation between stenosis severity and the probability of developing an ACS is well recognised.3 Indeed the majority of plaques (∼70%) leading to acute myocardial infarction are not of angiographic significance, implying that factors other than stenosis severity determine the probability of vessel closure. The term “vulnerable” plaque defines the vascular substrate most subject to superficial erosion or plaque rupture which may in turn lead to ACS. While there are multiple complex risk and “trigger” factors at work, accurate identification of a “vulnerable” plaque and efficacious treatment to “stabilise” it, thereby reducing the risk of thrombotic induced acute events, would be of major clinical use. In this review we examine stabilisation and passivation of the “vulnerable” plaque by systemic and local drug delivery (LDD). Plaque stabilisation can be defined by any intervention or interaction which, by causing a change in either the structure, content or function of an atherosclerotic plaque and/or the overlying endothelium, will either prevent or reduce the severity of erosion or rupture. Plaque passivation is defined as any intervention that decreases the thrombogenicity of the endoluminal oriented vascular surface. Established risk factors of plaque vulnerability include:
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Spratt (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: