Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study reveals quantitative design rules for synthetic cis-regulatory elements in mammalian stem cells, enabling programmable control of tissue patterning and gene circuits.
Cis-regulatory elements (CREs) control how genes respond to external signals, but the principles governing their structure and function remain poorly understood. While differential transcription factor binding is known to regulate gene expression, how CREs integrate the amount and combination of inputs to secure precise spatiotemporal profiles of gene expression remains unclear. Here, we developed a high-throughput combinatorial screening strategy, that we term NeMECiS, to investigate signal- dependent synthetic CREs (synCREs) in differentiating mammalian stem cells. By concatenating fragments of functional CREs from genes that respond to Sonic Hedgehog in the developing vertebrate neural tube, we found that CRE activity follows hierarchical design rules. While individual 200-base-pair fragments showed minimal activity, their combinations generated thousands of functional signal-responsive synCREs, many exceeding the activity of natural sequences. Statistical modelling revealed CRE function can be decomposed into specific quantitative contributions in which sequence fragments combine through a multiplicative rule, tuned by their relative positioning and spacing. These findings provide a predictive framework for CRE redesign, which we used to engineer synthetic CREs that alter the pattern of motor neuron differentiation in neural tissue. These findings establish quantitative principles for engineering synthetic regulatory elements with programmable signal responses to rewire genetic circuits and control stem cell differentiation, providing a basis for understanding developmental gene regulation and designing therapeutic gene expression systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cornwall-Scoones et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: