Authors
The kinetics of electron transfer between electrochemically passivated chromium and several outer‐sphere redox couples have been investigated as a function of passive‐film thickness, to 25 Å, in . The apparent rate of electron transfer decreased exponentially with increasing thickness of the passivating overlayer. Similarly, during potentiostatic film growth, the electron‐transfer rate decreased logarithmically with time, , as a consequence of the film‐growth kinetics, since varies with . These relationships indicate an electron‐tunneling controlled process. However, variations in the film thickness and defects result in electron transfer occurring at distributed sites of enhanced tunneling probability, making a meaningful quantitative analysis difficult.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moffat et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: