Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking study demonstrates real-time 3D perception accuracy in autonomous driving scenarios, indicating a viable pure-vision alternative to LiDAR.
Accurate and real-time 3D perception is essential for autonomous driving, particularly under occlusion, low illumination, and adverse weather conditions. To enhance the robustness and efficiency of stereo-based 3D detection, this study proposes YGS-Net, a dual-branch collaborative framework that integrates an improved YOLOv5 detector with a guided aggregation stereo-matching network. The detection branch incorporates coordinate attention, a bidirectional feature pyramid, and a DIoU regression loss to strengthen multi-scale feature representation and box localization. The depth branch produces dense and reliable disparity maps through GA-Net. A collaborative fusion mechanism maps each 2D detection to its corresponding disparity region and estimates depth via region-averaged disparity. Experiments on the KITTI dataset demonstrate that YGS-Net achieves 75.13% AP_3D (moderate) for the "car" category, outperforming PL++, DSGN, LIGA-Stereo, and YOLOStereo3D. Real-world tests show a relative ranging error below 2.5% within 20 meters and real-time performance at ~ 42 FPS. The results indicate that YGS-Net provides a balanced and reliable purely visual 3D perception solution for complex traffic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: