Cross-sectional survey reveals moderate knowledge but positive attitudes toward postoperative delirium in anesthesia staff, suggesting targeted education is needed to bridge care gaps.
This study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals in anesthesia-related departments regarding postoperative delirium (POD). A single-center, cross-sectional, self-reported online survey using snowball sampling was conducted at Second Xiangya Hospital from September to November 2024, and 550 valid questionnaires were included, corresponding to a valid questionnaire proportion of 96.15% (550/572) among the submitted questionnaires. Most respondents were nurses (80.7%) and female (71.8%), with 44.4% having 11–15 years of experience; 86.6% had managed POD before. Mean KAP scores were as follows: self-perceived knowledge 20.00 ± 7.33 (out of 32, 62.5%), attitude 42.43 ± 4.79 (84.9%), and practice 29.83 ± 6.44 (74.6%). According to predefined classification criteria, the mean perceived knowledge score fell within the moderate range. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships: knowledge correlated with attitude ( r = 0.741) and practice ( r = 0.688), and attitude with practice ( r = 0.703). Structural equation modeling showed significant associations among knowledge, attitude, and practice, with knowledge associated with both attitude and practice, and attitude associated with practice. Healthcare professionals in anesthesia-related departments exhibited moderate perceived knowledge, positive attitudes, and relatively positive practices toward managing POD, with these domains being significantly interrelated. Addressing practical deficiencies requires integrating evidence-based tools, fostering continuous professional development, and tailoring interventions to specific cultural and organizational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: