Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychometric evaluation reveals regression to the mean across diverse psychological scales in US cohorts, indicating statistical artifacts can distort perceived changes in attitude.
Introduction: A series of recent studies using the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering (POSHA–S) have documented an extreme case of regression to the mean (RTM) or a “crossover” effect in public attitudes toward stuttering. Respondents were previously sorted according to changes in their attitudes. The “crossover” effect revealed that respondents with the highest pre-test scores had the lowest post-test scores, those with the lowest pre-test scores had the highest post-test scores, and those with intermediate scores changed minimally. Method: In this study, RTM was evaluated in four different measures from two USA samples: Bipolar Adjective Scale (BAS), Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS), Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons (ATDP) scale, and Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI). Results: The “crossover” effect was observed in three of these scales as well as in one of two POSHA–S scores. Due to lower-than-expected test-retest correlations, correction for regression to the mean diminished or eliminated the “crossover” effect in some of the measures. Conclusions: Overall, the study showed that the “crossover” effect can be observed in widely different pre- versus post-test measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: