Theoretical analysis demonstrates performed philosophy of extended cognition in Ruth Ozeki's autofiction, highlighting how narrative acts build relational identity across readers and texts.
Autofiction is often considered a generic hybrid, combining autobiographical and fictional modes. This essay argues that many autofictional texts are interdisciplinary hybrids, too. Especially from the second half of the twentieth century onwards, autofictional texts often constitute profound theoretical engagements with the notions of self and identity-construction, and with questions of ethics and truth. The essay reads Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being (2013) as a theoretical-philosophical treatise and literary performance of relational individuation and shows how the book is in dialogue with moral-philosophical arguments by Judith Butler as well as with accounts of extended cognition, as they have been developed in philosophy of mind. By way of considering the reading experience, the essay reflects on how Ozeki's performed philosophy of what philosopher John Protevi terms ‘radical relationality’ complements more traditional philosophical accounts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexandra Effe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: