Conceptual critique demonstrates that explanatory usefulness fails to establish fundamental principles as ultimate reality, highlighting limits in traditional metaphysical claims.
A critique of the attempt to declare matter, consciousness, God, Being, information, or any other particular principle as the ultimate reality. The paper argues that explanatory usefulness does not by itself establish metaphysical ultimacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayank Singh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: