Observational study reveals that wearable gait sensors identify high prodromal symptom burden in Parkinson’s disease, suggesting sensor-based phenotypes reflect multisystem clinical involvement.
Objective wearable markers of Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression and phenotypic heterogeneity remain clinically relevant, particularly in relation to the burden of non-motor features that often precede or accompany the motor diagnosis. In patients with established PD, the retrospective accumulation of prodromal symptoms may identify a clinically meaningful subgroup with broader multisystem involvement. This study developed an interpretable machine-learning framework using wearable inertial gait data to model high retrospective prodromal burden within established PD, defined as the anamnestic presence of at least three prodromal symptoms. A total of 274 individuals with PD performed 30-m walking trials using a single lumbar inertial sensor. Thirty-five biomechanical and clinical variables were extracted, and feature selection identified five key predictors: multiscale entropy ( $$\:MSE$$ ) along three axes, vertical improved harmonic ratio ( \:iHRᵥ ), and body weight. A Random Forest classifier balanced through CTGAN-based training-set augmentation reached a cross-validated ROC AUC of 0.84 ( \:PRAUC = 0.86, $$\:F1-score$$ = 0.76); on the untouched real held-out test set, discrimination was \:ROCAUC = 0.74 and \:PRAUC = 0.71, consistent with an internally developed phenotyping model requiring external validation. Explainability analyses highlighted that increased $$\:MSE$$ and reduced \:iHRᵥ were the strongest contributors to high retrospective prodromal burden, indicating elevated gait complexity and altered spatio-temporal symmetry. These findings delineate an interpretable gait phenotype associated with high retrospective prodromal burden in established PD, supporting wearable gait analysis as a tool for within-PD digital phenotyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trabassi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: