Numerical simulation study demonstrates distinct near-field trade-offs across photonic platforms, guiding optimized design for nanophotonic sensing and light–matter interfaces.
Resonant diffraction by periodic photonic structures can generate strongly enhanced evanescent optical lattices near material interfaces. Here we compare this mechanism in three representative platforms: leaky guided modes, Bloch surface waves, and surface plasmon polaritons. Using Fourier modal method simulations and a semi-analytical nearest-neighbour model, we analyze linear, square, and hexagonal grating geometries under normally incident monochromatic illumination. The results show that the three platforms occupy distinct regimes of resonant near-field design. In the studied structures, leaky guided modes provide the largest resonant field enhancement and can yield very high absolute near-surface intensities, even when only a modest fraction of the stored intensity extends into the superstrate. Bloch-surface-wave and plasmonic lattices place their field maxima directly at the upper interface and can exhibit longer evanescent tails, but with platform-specific constraints such as multilayer coupling or metallic loss. We identify the trade-off between resonant enhancement, surface accessibility, penetration depth, visibility, and polarization response, providing design guidelines for structured near fields in nanophotonic sensing, microscopy, and surface-based light–matter interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asilevi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: