Why the study?
Adults with complex congenital heart disease have a high prevalence of AF, but thromboembolic and bleeding risks and comparative bleeding outcomes between warfarin and DOACs needed evaluation.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) increase major bleeding compared to warfarin in adults with Tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and atrial fibrillation?
Population
300 adults with TOF-PS, TOF-PA, or PA-IVS treated for AF
Comparison
DOACs vs warfarin
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Follow-up
Mean 7.9 years
Key result
In adults with Tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonary atresia and atrial fibrillation, DOAC therapy was associated with a higher major bleeding risk than warfarin (adjusted HR 5.77; p<0.001).
Authors
Loading...
May warrant warfarin preference over DOACs in ToF/PA with AF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in congenital heart disease.
Cohort (n=300)
Yes
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) increase major bleeding compared to warfarin in adults with Tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 5.77
p-value: p=<0.001
In adults with complex congenital heart disease (ToF and PA-IVS) and atrial arrhythmias, DOAC therapy is associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin.
O’Shea et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and atrial fibrillation (n=300). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Major bleeding (adjusted HR 5.77, p=<0.001). In adults with Tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonary atresia and atrial fibrillation, DOAC therapy was associated with a higher major bleeding risk than warfarin (adjusted HR 5.77; p<0.001).