Experimental and numerical study demonstrates accurate crack network identification in aerospace components, indicating high viability for online structural health monitoring.
Accurate identification of complex crack networks with branching and intersecting topologies remains a challenge in aerospace and civil engineering. Conventional non-destructive testing techniques are constrained by limited coverage and equipment access requirements, while model-based inverse methods face the curse of dimensionality and high computational cost when characterizing intricate crack morphologies. To address these limitations, a Binary-encoded Transformable Modular Component (BTMC) method is proposed, which abstracts complex crack morphologies into combinations of modular components representing elementary crack topological operations and encodes their parameters into a unified binary genotype. This representation converts the high-dimensional continuous inverse problem into a discrete combinatorial optimization task over a bounded search space, and the extended finite element method is coupled with a genetic algorithm for forward analysis and parameter optimization. Numerical simulations covering non-intersecting cracks, intersecting networks, and irregular morphologies beyond the component library demonstrate that the method maintains stable identification accuracy under measurement noise up to 10%. Experimental verification on a metal tensile plate and a wing surface curved-shell structure confirms that the identified configurations are mechanically consistent with the measurements, with the strain-response error on the wing surface reduced from 8.67% for the traditional genetic algorithm to 2.27% for BTMC. Across all test cases, the BTMC method converges in fewer generations with a total identification time of approximately 16 min on average, which provides a computationally efficient framework for online structural health monitoring of aircraft structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: