Perspective highlights the critical role of early pathology input in biomarker-driven cancer trials, indicating improved trial feasibility, specimen governance, and clinical translation.
Pathology is central to many biologically driven cancer clinical trials. Biomarker-led and translational studies depend on robust tissue pathways, cellular and molecular assays, pathology-derived endpoints, and clinically meaningful interpretation of discovery science. Where trials depend on tumour material, biomarker-defined eligibility or mechanism-focused endpoints, pathology expertise should be embedded early, before protocols, budgets, and assays are fixed. Early pathology input strengthens feasibility, specimen governance, assay selection, quality assurance, and the long-term value of collected samples. In the UK, the Clinical Trials Pathology Advisory Group, now within the new Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland Clinical Trials Pathology subcommittee, provides a practical route for pre-submission specialist review. This Perspective argues that pathology is core infrastructure for biologically rich trials, linking discovery science to clinical translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dave et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: