Ecological niche modeling reveals divergent redistribution patterns across four Fusarium graminearum groups under climate change, highlighting shifting regional crop disease and mycotoxin risks.
The Fusarium graminearum species complex (FGSC) is a major causal agent of Fusarium head blight (FHB) and trichothecene contamination in cereal cropping systems worldwide. However, its major species-genotype groups exhibit distinct differences in environmental adaptability and spatial distribution. Using a host-informed MaxEnt modeling framework, this study compared the global potential environmental suitability of four major FGSC groups, namely Fusarium asiaticum-DON (Fa-DON), Fusarium asiaticum-NIV (Fa-NIV), Fusarium graminearum-DON (Fg-DON), and Fusarium graminearum-NIV (Fg-NIV), under the 1970–2000 baseline and four SSPs across four future periods. By integrating georeferenced occurrence records with continuous host-related, climatic, soil, topographic, and wind predictors, and applying four-fold spatial cross-validation, we identified distinct intergroup suitability patterns. Under current conditions, Fg-DON showed the broadest highly suitable area, whereas Fa-DON was the most restricted. Both F. asiaticum groups were centered in Asia, while Fg-NIV was concentrated mainly in Europe. Future projections indicated consistent expansion for Fg-DON and general contraction for Fa-DON. Fa-NIV remained comparatively stable, whereas Fg-NIV showed scenario-dependent contraction or expansion. These changes reflected regional redistribution rather than a uniform shift across groups. Collectively, our findings indicate that FGSC suitability should be interpreted as a set of differentiated, group-specific biogeographic patterns, which provide a more targeted scientific basis for surveillance strategies and regional risk assessment of FHB and trichothecene contamination under changing environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: