Key result
GWAS-by-subtraction identifies 14 ischaemic stroke loci independent of shared CAD genetics.
Why the study?
Genetic overlap between any ischaemic stroke and coronary artery disease can obscure associations less closely tied to coronary risk.
Observational (n=1,296,908)
GWAS-by-subtraction successfully isolated a residual genetic component for ischemic stroke independent of coronary artery disease, revealing 14 distinct loci and highlighting a stronger genetic link to cardioembolic stroke.
Separates stroke-specific from shared CAD genetics; extends GWAS methods but leaves clinical translation open.
Background/Objectives: Genetic overlap between any ischaemic stroke (AIS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) can obscure associations less closely tied to coronary risk. We aimed to separate coronary-shared from residual AIS genetic effects. Methods: We applied GWAS-by-subtraction to GIGASTROKE AIS and UK Biobank/CARDIoGRAMplusC4D CAD summary statistics. A Cholesky model separated a CAD-related shared component (F1) from a model-defined residual AIS component (F2). We tested model order, factor covariance, population prevalence, CAD input, LD reference and sample-size parameter then characterised loci using FUMA, SuSiE-RSS, genetic correlation, MAGMA, SMR/HEIDI and targeted colocalisation. Results: AIS and CAD had a genetic correlation of 0.490. F1 and F2 had SNP heritabilities of 0.0251 and 0.00414, and F2 contained 14 FUMA loci. F2 Z scores remained correlated across covariance (minimum r = 0.994), prevalence (minimum r = 0.998) and alternative-CAD analyses (r = 0.984). Reverse ordering produced reallocation of source-trait signal. At rs974819, the T allele was associated positively with CAD and negatively with marginal AIS, producing a model-derived CAD-AIS-discordant F2 association. Source-trait colocalisation showed that NBEAL1, PHACTR1 and PDGFD signals were present in one or both input-trait analyses, whereas the F11 protein signal aligned with AIS and F2. In a potentially overlapping FinnGen cross-implementation analysis, all 13 F2 lead variants showed concordant directions. Within overlapping stroke-subtype analyses, F2 showed stronger alignment with cardioembolic stroke. Conclusions: GWAS-by-subtraction resolved a model-defined residual AIS component that was stable across covariance, prevalence and CAD-input specifications, supporting a component-based view of AIS genetic effects after modelling shared coronary architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ischaemic stroke and coronary artery disease (n=1,296,908). Residual ischaemic stroke genetic component (F2) vs. CAD-related shared genetic component (F1) was evaluated on Genetic correlation between any ischaemic stroke and coronary artery disease (rg 0.490). GWAS-by-subtraction resolved a residual ischaemic stroke genetic component containing 14 loci, distinct from shared coronary artery disease architecture, including a novel discordant association at rs974819.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: