Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates high-precision defect detection in fired refractories using an automated impact-acoustic system, highlighting potential for at-line industrial quality control.
Refractory materials often develop latent internal defects during multi-stage thermo-mechanical processing that evade surface inspection. While conventional impact-acoustic methods detect such anomalies, their reliability is undermined by operator-dependent variability in excitation force, transducer positioining, and contact pressure. To overcome these limitations, this study presents the Automated Unit for Refractory Assessment (AURA), an integrated platform automating impact-acoustic non-destructive testing for fired refractories. AURA combines as a servo-controlled impactor with an actuator-driven clamping mechanism to standardize acoustic excitation and maintain consistent contact, achieving a signal energy coefficient of variation of 2.42%. Acquired acoustic signals are processed using a one-dimensional convolutional neural network with Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping to isolate relevant spectral regions and extract 66 discriminative features. These features train a lightweight artifical neural netwrok classifier, achieving a high precision of 0.9946. The results demonstrate that integrating automated hardware acquisition with explainable artificial intelligence provides a robust, interpretable framwork for at-line quality control, reducing data dimensionality by 99% while secuirng exceptional diagnostic performace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: