Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review reveals that injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels enhance localized drug retention across preclinical models, indicating substantial potential for targeted depot therapy.
Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels are useful for localized drug delivery because they can be administered as low-viscosity formulations and then form, or reinforce, therapeutic depots directly at diseased tissue sites. Their common design principle is a temperature-dependent transition from a flowable formulation before administration to an in situ matrix at physiological temperature, or a thermally regulated change in swelling, mesh size, drug-matrix affinity or degradation. This review focuses on thermoresponsive injectable systems for localized delivery, including PNIPAM-based systems, poloxamers/Pluronics, PEG/polyester block copolymers, polyurethane-based hydrogels, chitosan-based thermogels, hyaluronan- and glycosaminoglycan-based systems, and selected multicomponent or nanocomposite networks. The in vivo application areas considered are local cancer therapy, wound healing and antibacterial treatment, osteoarthritis and intra-articular delivery, and myocardial infarction/cardiac repair. Across these indications, preclinical studies suggest that thermoresponsive hydrogels may prolong local residence time, reduce systemic exposure, enhance delivery of poorly soluble or unstable payloads, and modulate disease-specific microenvironments. Remaining challenges include gelation control, mechanical stability, degradation products, immune response, sterilization, manufacturing reproducibility, disease heterogeneity and robust translational validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: