Land take persists across Europe despite demographic stagnation and EU commitments to No Net Land Take (NNLT). Using Emilia-Romagna one of first Italian region to adopt a binding NNLT target (L.R. 24/2017) and a regional observatory of disused sites - as a case, we surveyed 68 stakeholders from public administrations, professionals, academia, and civic actors to calibrate a Decision Support System (DSS) for regeneration. Respondents strongly prefer reuse/reconversion of abandoned or underused areas over densification or greenfield expansion but report significant financial and governance constraints: high regeneration costs, fragmented competences, and lengthy approvals. Social and environmental benefits are prioritized over economic gains, and climate risk is the highest-ranked criterion for site selection. Framed by DPSIR, legacy greenfield economics and NNLT commitments act as Drivers; finance/governance barriers as Pressures; uneven readiness as State; financing/prioritization bottlenecks as Impacts; and reuse-first strategies with analytical DSS functions as Responses. We propose a stakeholder-informed DSS linking scenario analysis, trade-off evaluation, and participatory inputs to permitting and financing pathways. Future work will test the DSS on cases, extend surveys, and integrate geospatial data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozlova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: