Pilot cohort study uncovers preoperative urine biomarkers of futile recanalization in stroke patients, suggesting redox and metabolic dysfunction.
Background and objective Endovascular treatment (EVT) effectively treats acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO), but ~50% of successfully recanalized patients experience futile recanalization (FR). This pilot exploratory study characterized preoperative urine metabolic profiles of FR after EVT in LVO-AIS to screen candidate metabolites and pathways. Methods Patients with anterior circulation LVO-AIS who underwent successful EVT were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative urine was analyzed by untargeted LC–MS/MS. FR was defined as 90-day mRS > 2. Differential metabolites were screened using VIP > 1 and P < 0.05 (exploratory threshold, FDR uncorrected). KEGG pathway enrichment, logistic regression, and ROC curves were applied. Results Among 42 patients (21 FR, 21 non-FR), three candidate metabolites that were upregulated in FR were preliminarily identified: thiamine pyrophosphate, dehydroascorbic acid, and γ-glutamylcysteine. They were enriched in glutathione/ascorbate metabolism, ferroptosis, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, involving antioxidant stress, energy metabolism, and cell death. Dehydroascorbic acid and γ-glutamylcysteine were significantly associated with FR ( P < 0.05); thiamine pyrophosphate showed borderline significance ( P = 0.061). γ-Glutamylcysteine negatively correlated with ASPECTS ( r = −0.558, P < 0.001), and thiamine pyrophosphate with collateral circulation score ( r = −0.384, P = 0.012). The three-metabolite panel showed a preliminary discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.893 (95% CI 0.780–0.915). Conclusion This pilot exploratory study provides the first description of preoperative urine metabolic alterations associated with FR after EVT in LVO-AIS, suggesting redox imbalance and energy disturbance as potential mechanisms, but findings require validation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: